Odds
Player analysis
M. Krueger comes into this match in difficult form — 0 wins from the last 5. Point statistics tell a concerning story — average DS of -4.9, meaning M. Krueger has been on the wrong side of most exchanges over five matches. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.0/10, leaving M. Krueger vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency is a red flag — M. Krueger has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -26 over recent matches.
N. Basavareddy has been inconsistent recently, going 3–2 over the last five matches. Point statistics tell a concerning story — average DS of -1.3, meaning N. Basavareddy has been on the wrong side of most exchanges over five matches. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.2/10, leaving N. Basavareddy vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Good performance in key moments — break point efficiency of +13 over the last five.
Recent form
0W 5L last 5
| 6 Apr | Barton | 4-6 4-6 | L |
| 28 Mar | Draxl | 6-3 1-6 7-6 | L |
| 23 Mar | Gojo | 6-7 4-6 | L |
| 11 Mar | Bicknell | 6-7 7-5 4-6 | L |
| 3 Mar | Svrcina | 6-7 4-6 | L |
3W 2L last 5
| 8 Apr | Barton | 6-1 7-6 | W |
| 7 Apr | Draxl | 6-3 7-6 | W |
| 2 Apr | Tien | 6-3 3-6 6-1 | L |
| 31 Mar | Draxl | 6-3 2-6 6-4 | W |
| 17 Mar | Vera | 3-6 2-6 | L |
Clay court stats
Avg stats — last 5
Head to head
Career meetings between these two players (all tournaments), not only this event. The match at the top of the page is the current tournament fixture.
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rome | Clay | Semi-finals | Basavareddy | 5-7 1-6 |

