Odds
Player analysis
Z. Bergs comes into this match in difficult form — 2 wins from the last 5. Point statistics tell a concerning story — average DS of -4.1, meaning Z. Bergs has been on the wrong side of most exchanges over five matches. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.1/10, leaving Z. Bergs vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency is a red flag — Z. Bergs has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -35 over recent matches.
T. M. Etcheverry has been inconsistent recently, going 3–2 over the last five matches. Point statistics tell a concerning story — average DS of -1.4, meaning T. M. Etcheverry has been on the wrong side of most exchanges over five matches. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.2/10, leaving T. M. Etcheverry vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency is a red flag — T. M. Etcheverry has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -17 over recent matches.
Recent form
2W 3L last 5
| 19 Mar | Brooksby | 7-5 6-2 | W |
| 7 Mar | Paul | 1-6 2-6 | L |
| 4 Mar | Struff | 6-3 6-4 | W |
| 24 Feb | Brooksby | 3-6 4-6 | L |
| 18 Feb | Lehecka | 6-2 6-1 | L |
4W 1L last 5
| 7 Mar | Shapovalov | 3-6 6-2 6-7 | L |
| 22 Feb | Tabilo | 6-3 6-7 4-6 | W |
| 22 Feb | Kopriva | 4-6 7-6 7-6 | W |
| 20 Feb | Faria | 7-6 6-4 | W |
| 19 Feb | Gaubas | 7-6 6-4 | W |
Hard court stats
Avg stats — last 5
Head to head
Career meetings between these two players (all tournaments), not only this event. The match at the top of the page is the current tournament fixture.
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATP Winston-Salem | Hard | 1/16-finals | Bergs | 6-4 5-7 3-6 |