RUBLEV
1.37
·
GRIEKSPOOR
3.41
Odds
Market
Rublev
Griekspoor
Winner
1.37
3.41
Player analysis
A. Rublev has been inconsistent recently, going 3–2 over the last five matches. Point margins have been modest — DS averaging +6.8. Wins have been functional rather than dominant. Serve quality has been average (6.6/10) — neither a weapon nor a significant liability.
DS 6.82Trend mixed
T. Griekspoor shows a 4–1 form record, though the level of opposition has been mixed — average ranking of opponents is 34. Point margins have been modest — DS averaging +5.2. Wins have been functional rather than dominant. Serve quality has been average (6.9/10) — neither a weapon nor a significant liability. Good performance in key moments — break point efficiency of +20 over the last five.
DS 5.18Trend mixed
Recent form
3W 2L last 5
| 27 Feb | Griekspoor | 5-7 6-7 | L |
| 26 Feb | Mensik | 3-6 6-3 2-6 | W |
| 25 Feb | Griekspoor | 6-3 7-6 | L |
| 24 Feb | Virtanen | 3-6 4-6 | W |
| 13 Feb | Griekspoor | 6-7 2-6 | W |
2W 3L last 5
| 7 Mar | Rublev | 7-6 6-7 3-6 | W |
| 27 Feb | Rublev | 5-7 6-7 | W |
| 26 Feb | Rublev | 6-2 6-4 | L |
| 25 Feb | Rublev | 6-4 6-7 6-3 | L |
| 24 Feb | Rublev | 6-3 6-4 | L |
Hard court stats
RublevStatGriekspoor
62.8%Win rate52.9%
311–184W–L111–99
Avg stats — last 5
1st serve %60%
1st serve won80%
2nd serve won50%
BP converted30%
BP saved60%
Aces11
Double faults3
1st serve %60%
1st serve won80%
2nd serve won60%
BP converted70%
BP saved50%
Aces10
Double faults2
Head to head
3–1
Hard 1–1
Clay 1–0
Grass 1–0
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dubai | Hard | Semi-finals | Griekspoor | 5-7 6-7 | |
| ATP Madrid | Clay | 1/8-finals | Rublev | 6-2 6-4 | |
| ATP Halle | Grass | Quarter-finals | Rublev | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | |
| Doha | Hard | 1/8-finals | Rublev | 1-6 6-1 7-6 |

