H2H
Head to Head · ATP Tour
By surface
Clay
0–2
Zverev leads · 2 matches
Hard
1–4
Zverev leads · 5 matches
Grass
0–1
Zverev leads · 1 matches
Indoor
1–1
Tied leads · 2 matches
Stats comparison
GriekspoorStatZverev
59%Win rate68%
63%Clay W%71%
53%Hard W%67%
8.8Aces/match11.8
66%1st serve %72%
—BP converted—
21%Return pts won30%
#30ATP ranking#3
Current form
4W 1L last 5 · streak L1
| 02 Apr | L. van Assche | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | L |
| 27 Feb | A. Rublev | 5-7 6-7 | W |
| 26 Feb | J. Mensik | 3-6 6-3 2-6 | W |
| 25 Feb | A. Bublik | 6-3 7-6 | W |
| 24 Feb | O. Virtanen | 3-6 4-6 | W |
4W 1L last 5 · streak L1
| 28 Mar | J. Sinner | 3-6 6-7 | L |
| 27 Mar | F. Cerundolo | 1-6 2-6 | W |
| 25 Mar | Q. Halys | 6-7 6-7 | W |
| 23 Mar | M. Cilic | 2-6 7-5 4-6 | W |
| 22 Mar | M. Damm | 2-6 4-6 | W |
Match history
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATP United Cup | Hard | — | Zverev | 7-5 6-0 | |
| Munich | Clay | Quarter-finals | Zverev | 6-7 7-6 6-4 | |
| ATP Indian Wells | Hard | Indian Wells - 1/32-finals | Griekspoor | 6-4 6-7 6-7 | |
| ATP Paris | Indoor | 1/16-finals | Zverev | 7-6 6-3 | |
| ATP Shanghai | Hard | 1/16-finals | Zverev | 6-7 6-2 6-7 | |
| ATP French Open | Clay | 1/16-finals | Zverev | 3-6 6-4 6-2 4-6 7-6 | |
| ATP Indian Wells | Hard | 1/16-finals | Zverev | 7-6 6-3 | |
| ATP Toronto | Hard | 1/32-finals | Zverev | 6-4 7-6 | |
| Rotterdam | Indoor | 1/8-finals | Griekspoor | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | |
| Wimbledon | Grass | 1/64-finals | Zverev | 3-6 4-6 1-6 |
Analysis
Griekspoor vs Zverev Head to Head
Tallon Griekspoor and Alexander Zverev have clashed 10 times, producing some of the most memorable matches in recent years. Overall, Alexander Zverev leads 8 wins to 2.
Their clay-court record stands at 0–2 in favour of Zverev.
On hard, Zverev leads 1–4 from 5 matches.
Their grass-court record stands at 0–1 in favour of Zverev.
Indoor, the record is 1–1 across 2 matches.
Their most recent meeting was at ATP United Cup 2026, won by Zverev.
Win rates: Griekspoor 59%, Zverev 68%. When they next meet, surface and form will be key factors.