Odds
Player analysis
M. Andreeva has been inconsistent recently, going 3–2 over the last five matches. Form is mixed — DS ranging from -6.6 to 44.0, with at least one match where M. Andreeva was clearly outplayed. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.1/10, leaving M. Andreeva vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Good performance in key moments — break point efficiency of +18 over the last five.
L. Noskova has been inconsistent recently, going 3–2 over the last five matches. Point margins have been modest — DS averaging +7.2. Wins have been functional rather than dominant. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.3/10, leaving L. Noskova vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure.
Recent form
3W 2L last 5
| 20 Mar | Noskova | 2-6 6-3 4-6 | W |
| 14 Mar | Sabalenka | 6-3 6-4 | L |
| 12 Mar | Noskova | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | L |
| 11 Mar | Eala | 2-6 0-6 | W |
| 8 Mar | Cirstea | 7-6 4-6 4-6 | W |
2W 3L last 5
| 23 Mar | Andreeva | 6-7 6-4 0-6 | W |
| 21 Mar | Andreeva | 7-6 6-2 | L |
| 20 Mar | Andreeva | 6-1 6-7 6-1 | L |
| 9 Mar | Andreeva | 6-4 6-7 3-6 | W |
| 8 Mar | Andreeva | 6-0 6-0 | L |
Grass court stats
Avg stats — last 5
Head to head
Career meetings between these two players (all tournaments), not only this event. The match at the top of the page is the current tournament fixture.
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WTA Brisbane | Hard | 1/8-finals | Andreeva | 5-7 6-4 7-5 | |
| Bad Homburg | Grass | Quarter-finals | Noskova | 3-6 3-6 | |
| Rome | Clay | 1/16-finals | Andreeva | 1-6 5-7 | |
| Brisbane | Hard | 1/8-finals | Andreeva | 3-6 0-6 | |
| WTA Madrid | Clay | 1/32-finals | Andreeva | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | |
| WTA Brisbane | Hard | Quarter-finals | Noskova | 7-5 6-3 |

