Odds
Player analysis
V. Kudermetova comes into this match in difficult form — 2 wins from the last 5. Form is mixed — DS ranging from -13.5 to 21.9, with at least one match where V. Kudermetova was clearly outplayed. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 5.8/10, leaving V. Kudermetova vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency is a red flag — V. Kudermetova has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -15 over recent matches.
A. Anisimova has been inconsistent recently, going 3–2 over the last five matches. Form is mixed — DS ranging from -19.0 to 43.2, with at least one match where A. Anisimova was clearly outplayed. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 5.8/10, leaving A. Anisimova vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency is a red flag — A. Anisimova has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -24 over recent matches.
Recent form
2W 3L last 5
| 16 Oct | Paolini | 2-6 5-7 Ret. | L |
| 14 Oct | Ruzic | 3-6 2-6 Ret. | W |
| 7 Oct | Frech | 6-3 2-6 6-3 Ret. | L |
| 28 Sep | Bouzkova | 3-6 5-7 Ret. | L |
| 26 Sep | Bondar | 7-5 6-3 Ret. | W |
3W 2L last 5
| 11 Mar | Mboko | 6-4 6-1 | L |
| 9 Mar | Raducanu | 1-6 1-6 | W |
| 7 Mar | Blinkova | 7-5 1-6 0-6 | W |
| 20 Feb | Pegula | 1-6 6-4 6-3 | L |
| 19 Feb | Andreeva | 6-2 5-7 6-7 | W |
Clay court stats
Avg stats — last 5
Head to head
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rome | Clay | 1/32-finals | Kudermetova | 7-6 7-5 | |
| Charleston | Clay | 1/16-finals | Anisimova | 6-2 6-2 | |
| Adelaide | Hard | 1/16-finals | Kudermetova | 3-6 |

