Odds
Player analysis
J. Pegula arrives in exceptional form — five wins from five, all against top-40 opposition. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.1/10, leaving J. Pegula vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure.
A. Blinkova comes into this match in difficult form — 2 wins from the last 5. Point statistics tell a concerning story — average DS of -3.5, meaning A. Blinkova has been on the wrong side of most exchanges over five matches. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 5.2/10, leaving A. Blinkova vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency is a red flag — A. Blinkova has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -11 over recent matches.
Recent form
3W 2L last 5
| 2 Apr | Riera | 0-6 6-2 6-1 | L |
| 31 Mar | Montgomery | 2-6 3-6 | W |
| 20 Mar | Blinkova | 2-6 0-6 | W |
| 18 Mar | Kenin | 6-3 1-6 3-6 | W |
| 9 Mar | Zarazua | 6-3 6-7 6-4 | L |
0W 5L last 5
| 5 Apr | Pegula | 6-2 6-2 | L |
| 4 Apr | Pegula | 6-4 5-7 6-3 | L |
| 3 Apr | Pegula | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | L |
| 2 Apr | Pegula | 1-6 6-1 7-6 | L |
| 1 Apr | Pegula | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | L |
Hard court stats
Avg stats — last 5
Head to head
Career meetings between these two players (all tournaments), not only this event. The match at the top of the page is the current tournament fixture.
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US Open | Hard | 1/32-finals | Pegula | 6-1 6-3 | |
| Austin | Hard | Quarter-finals | Pegula | 6-2 6-2 | |
| WTA Indian Wells | Hard | 1/32-finals | Blinkova | 2-6 6-3 3-6 | |
| San Diego | Hard | Quarter-finals | Pegula | 6-1 2-6 6-2 | |
| WTA Beijing | Hard | 1/16-finals | Pegula | 6-7 6-2 6-1 | |
| WTA Charleston | Clay | 1/16-finals | Pegula | 6-2 |

