Odds
Player analysis
T. M. Etcheverry has been inconsistent recently, going 3–2 over the last five matches. Point statistics tell a concerning story — average DS of -1.4, meaning T. M. Etcheverry has been on the wrong side of most exchanges over five matches. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.2/10, leaving T. M. Etcheverry vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency is a red flag — T. M. Etcheverry has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -17 over recent matches.
A. Bublik comes into this match in difficult form — 2 wins from the last 5. Form is mixed — DS ranging from -13.6 to 10.9, with at least one match where A. Bublik was clearly outplayed. Serve quality has been average (6.6/10) — neither a weapon nor a significant liability.
Recent form
3W 2L last 5
| 20 Mar | Bublik | 4-6 4-6 | W |
| 9 Mar | Bublik | 7-6 6-7 3-6 | W |
| 8 Mar | Bublik | 3-6 7-6 6-2 | L |
| 25 Feb | Griekspoor | 6-3 7-6 | L |
| 24 Feb | Struff | 3-6 4-6 | W |
3W 2L last 5
| 3 Apr | Etcheverry | 4-6 2-6 | W |
| 1 Apr | Etcheverry | 6-7 6-0 6-3 | L |
| 31 Mar | Etcheverry | 1-6 6-1 6-4 | L |
| 24 Mar | Etcheverry | 1-6 3-6 | W |
| 22 Mar | Jodar | 5-7 4-6 | W |
Avg stats — last 5
Head to head
Career meetings between these two players (all tournaments), not only this event. The match at the top of the page is the current tournament fixture.
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Open | Hard | 1/16-finals | Bublik | 7-6 7-6 6-4 | |
| Turin 2 | Indoor | Quarter-finals | Bublik | 2-6 6-3 5-7 |