Odds
Player analysis
A. Cazaux has been inconsistent recently, going 3–2 over the last five matches. Form is mixed — DS ranging from -14.8 to 22.5, with at least one match where A. Cazaux was clearly outplayed. Serve quality has been average (6.5/10) — neither a weapon nor a significant liability. Break point efficiency is a red flag — A. Cazaux has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -16 over recent matches.
T. M. Etcheverry has been inconsistent recently, going 3–2 over the last five matches. Point statistics tell a concerning story — average DS of -1.4, meaning T. M. Etcheverry has been on the wrong side of most exchanges over five matches. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.2/10, leaving T. M. Etcheverry vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency is a red flag — T. M. Etcheverry has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -17 over recent matches.
Recent form
3W 2L last 5
| 3 Apr | Etcheverry | 4-6 2-6 | W |
| 1 Apr | Etcheverry | 6-7 6-0 6-3 | L |
| 31 Mar | Etcheverry | 1-6 6-1 6-4 | L |
| 24 Mar | Etcheverry | 1-6 3-6 | W |
| 22 Mar | Jodar | 5-7 4-6 | W |
2W 3L last 5
| 22 Mar | Tiafoe | 7-6 6-1 | L |
| 21 Mar | Cazaux | 7-5 6-4 | L |
| 12 Mar | Fearnley | 2-6 6-3 1-6 | W |
| 3 Jan | Cazaux | 6-3 6-2 | L |
| 4 Nov | Cazaux | 7-6 6-7 2-6 | W |
Clay court stats
Avg stats — last 5
Head to head
Career meetings between these two players (all tournaments), not only this event. The match at the top of the page is the current tournament fixture.
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gstaad | Clay | 1/8-finals | Cazaux | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | |
| ATP French Open | Clay | 1/64-finals | Etcheverry | 3-6 6-2 6-1 6-4 | |
| Bordeaux Challenger Men | Clay | 1/8-finals | Etcheverry | 6-7 5-7 |