Odds
Player analysis
T. Daniel shows a 4–1 form record, though the level of opposition has been mixed — average ranking of opponents is 307. Point margins have been modest — DS averaging +7.2. Wins have been functional rather than dominant. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.5/10, leaving T. Daniel vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency has been exceptional (+34) — converting opportunities and shutting down threats at the critical moments.
Y. Hanfmann shows a 4–1 form record, though the level of opposition has been mixed — average ranking of opponents is 200. Point margins have been modest — DS averaging +7.5. Wins have been functional rather than dominant. Serve quality has been average (6.7/10) — neither a weapon nor a significant liability.
Recent form
2W 3L last 5
| 1 Apr | Bennani | 4-6 7-6 2-6 | W |
| 30 Mar | Jong | 6-7 4-6 | W |
| 19 Mar | Jodar | 6-4 4-6 6-1 | L |
| 17 Mar | Hanfmann | 6-1 5-7 6-3 | L |
| 16 Mar | Hanfmann | 6-3 6-4 | L |
3W 2L last 5
| 22 Mar | Daniel | 6-4 4-6 3-6 | W |
| 21 Mar | Daniel | 6-7 6-3 6-4 | L |
| 20 Mar | Mena | 3-6 4-6 | W |
| 19 Mar | Daniel | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | L |
| 17 Mar | Delaney | 4-6 2-6 | W |
Clay court stats
Avg stats — last 5
Head to head
Career meetings between these two players (all tournaments), not only this event. The match at the top of the page is the current tournament fixture.
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rome | Clay | Semi-finals | Hanfmann | 2-6 6-4 4-6 | |
| Braunschweig | Clay | 1/8-finals | Daniel | 6-4 3-6 2-6 | |
| Burnie | Hard | Final | Daniel | 6-2 6-2 |

