Odds
Player analysis
B. Van De Zandschulp has been inconsistent recently, going 3–2 over the last five matches. Point margins have been modest — DS averaging +7.7. Wins have been functional rather than dominant. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.1/10, leaving B. Van De Zandschulp vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Good performance in key moments — break point efficiency of +17 over the last five.
R. Gasquet comes into this match in difficult form — 2 wins from the last 5. Point statistics tell a concerning story — average DS of -4.2, meaning R. Gasquet has been on the wrong side of most exchanges over five matches. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 5.6/10, leaving R. Gasquet vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency is a red flag — R. Gasquet has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -22 over recent matches.
Recent form
1W 4L last 5
| 18 Jul | Cobolli | 6-2 6-4 Ret. | L |
| 17 Jul | Gasquet | 5-7 6-2 10-6 Ret. | L |
| 29 May | Sinner | 6-3 6-0 6-4 Ret. | L |
| 26 May | Atmane | 2-6 6-2 3-6 0-6 Ret. | W |
| 9 Apr | Altmaier | 7-5 5-7 6-2 Ret. | L |
3W 2L last 5
| 20 Mar | Zandschulp | 3-6 7-6 3-6 | W |
| 19 Mar | Shapovalov | 5-7 3-6 | W |
| 6 Mar | Cerundolo | 7-6 6-7 6-3 | L |
| 21 Feb | Zandschulp | 3-6 2-6 | W |
| 13 Feb | Minaur | 3-6 7-6 7-5 | L |
Clay court stats
Avg stats — last 5
Head to head
Career meetings between these two players (all tournaments), not only this event. The match at the top of the page is the current tournament fixture.
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bucharest | Clay | 1/16-finals | Gasquet | 6-4 5-7 1-6 | |
| Wimbledon | Grass | 1/16-finals | Zandschulp | 5-7 6-2 6-7 1-6 |

