Odds
Player analysis
M. Navone arrives in exceptional form — five wins from five. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 5.9/10, leaving M. Navone vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Good performance in key moments — break point efficiency of +12 over the last five.
B. Van De Zandschulp has been inconsistent recently, going 3–2 over the last five matches. Point margins have been modest — DS averaging +7.7. Wins have been functional rather than dominant. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.1/10, leaving B. Van De Zandschulp vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Good performance in key moments — break point efficiency of +17 over the last five.
Recent form
5W 0L last 5
| 4 Apr | Zandschulp | 5-7 7-6 7-5 | W |
| 3 Apr | Dzumhur | 3-6 3-6 | W |
| 1 Apr | Shevchenko | 5-7 1-6 | W |
| 31 Mar | Maestrelli | 3-6 2-6 | W |
| 20 Mar | Zandschulp | 3-6 7-6 3-6 | W |
3W 2L last 5
| 5 Apr | Navone | 6-2 4-6 7-5 | L |
| 4 Apr | Navone | 5-7 7-6 7-5 | L |
| 3 Apr | Molcan | 6-3 2-6 3-6 | W |
| 1 Apr | Moller | 2-6 1-6 | W |
| 31 Mar | O'Connell | 4-6 6-7 | W |
Clay court stats
Avg stats — last 5
Head to head
Career meetings between these two players (all tournaments), not only this event. The match at the top of the page is the current tournament fixture.
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bucharest | Clay | ATP Semi-finals | Navone | 5-7 7-6 7-5 | |
| Braunschweig | Clay | Quarter-finals | Navone | 6-3 7-5 |