Odds
Player analysis
T. M. Etcheverry has been inconsistent recently, going 3–2 over the last five matches. Point statistics tell a concerning story — average DS of -1.4, meaning T. M. Etcheverry has been on the wrong side of most exchanges over five matches. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.2/10, leaving T. M. Etcheverry vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency is a red flag — T. M. Etcheverry has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -17 over recent matches.
F. Cobolli has been inconsistent recently, going 3–2 over the last five matches. Point statistics tell a concerning story — average DS of -6.1, meaning F. Cobolli has been on the wrong side of most exchanges over five matches. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 5.8/10, leaving F. Cobolli vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure.
Recent form
3W 2L last 5
| 3 Apr | Paul | 4-6 2-6 | L |
| 1 Apr | Bolt | 6-7 6-0 6-3 | W |
| 31 Mar | Gomez | 1-6 6-1 6-4 | W |
| 24 Mar | Paul | 1-6 3-6 | L |
| 22 Mar | Jodar | 5-7 4-6 | W |
3W 2L last 5
| 21 Mar | Collignon | 7-5 6-3 | L |
| 9 Mar | Tiafoe | 1-6 2-6 | L |
| 6 Mar | Kecmanovic | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | W |
| 1 Mar | Tiafoe | 7-6 6-4 | W |
| 28 Feb | Kecmanovic | 6-7 6-3 4-6 | W |
Clay court stats
Avg stats — last 5
Head to head
Career meetings between these two players (all tournaments), not only this event. The match at the top of the page is the current tournament fixture.
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hamburg | Clay | Semi-finals | Cobolli | 6-2 5-7 4-6 | |
| Australian Open | Hard | 1/64-finals | Etcheverry | 6-7 6-3 7-5 6-1 | |
| Perugia | Clay | 1/8-finals | Etcheverry | 6-2 6-7 6-3 | |
| Australian Open | Hard | Final | Etcheverry | 6-3 6-2 |