Odds
Player analysis
B. Van De Zandschulp has been inconsistent recently, going 3–2 over the last five matches. Point margins have been modest — DS averaging +7.7. Wins have been functional rather than dominant. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.1/10, leaving B. Van De Zandschulp vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Good performance in key moments — break point efficiency of +17 over the last five.
A. Davidovich Fokina comes into this match in difficult form — 2 wins from the last 5. Point statistics tell a concerning story — average DS of -1.0, meaning A. Davidovich Fokina has been on the wrong side of most exchanges over five matches. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.3/10, leaving A. Davidovich Fokina vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency is a red flag — A. Davidovich Fokina has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -24 over recent matches.
Recent form
3W 2L last 5
| 4 Apr | Navone | 5-7 7-6 7-5 | L |
| 3 Apr | Dzumhur | 3-6 3-6 | W |
| 1 Apr | Shevchenko | 5-7 1-6 | W |
| 31 Mar | Maestrelli | 3-6 2-6 | W |
| 20 Mar | Fritz | 3-6 7-6 3-6 | L |
2W 3L last 5
| 21 Mar | Halys | 6-7 4-6 | L |
| 10 Mar | Tien | 4-6 6-1 7-6 | L |
| 8 Mar | Mensik | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | W |
| 7 Mar | Svajda | 7-6 6-2 | W |
| 26 Feb | Bellucci | 6-3 6-3 | L |
Grass court stats
Avg stats — last 5
Head to head
Career meetings between these two players (all tournaments), not only this event. The match at the top of the page is the current tournament fixture.
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wimbledon | Grass | 1/32-finals | Fokina | 1-6 6-4 3-6 6-7 | |
| ATP Wimbledon | Grass | 1/32-finals | Fokina | 6-1 2-6 6-4 6-3 | |
| Hamburg | Clay | 1/16-finals | Fokina | 4-6 4-6 | |
| London | Grass | Quarter-finals | Zandschulp | 2-6 4-6 |

