Odds
Player analysis
A. Zverev shows a 4–1 form record, though the level of opposition has been mixed — average ranking of opponents is 57. Point dominance has been clear and improving — average DS of +12.9, trending upward over the last three matches. Serve quality has been average (7.4/10) — neither a weapon nor a significant liability. Break point efficiency is a red flag — A. Zverev has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -18 over recent matches.
T. Fritz has been inconsistent recently, going 3–2 over the last five matches. Point margins have been modest — DS averaging +6.3. Wins have been functional rather than dominant. Serve quality has been average (6.9/10) — neither a weapon nor a significant liability.
Recent form
4W 1L last 5
| 28 Mar | Sinner | 3-6 6-7 | L |
| 27 Mar | Cerundolo | 1-6 2-6 | W |
| 25 Mar | Halys | 6-7 6-7 | W |
| 23 Mar | Cilic | 2-6 7-5 4-6 | W |
| 22 Mar | Damm | 2-6 4-6 | W |
3W 2L last 5
| 24 Mar | Lehecka | 6-4 6-7 6-2 | L |
| 22 Mar | Opelka | 3-6 4-6 | W |
| 20 Mar | Zandschulp | 3-6 7-6 3-6 | W |
| 9 Mar | Michelsen | 6-4 7-6 | L |
| 8 Mar | Fearnley | 3-6 7-6 1-6 | W |
Avg stats — last 5
Head to head
Career meetings between these two players (all tournaments), not only this event. The match at the top of the page is the current tournament fixture.
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Six Kings Slam | Indoor | Quarter-finals | Fritz | 6-3 6-4 | |
| ATP Laver Cup | Indoor | Fritz | 3-6 6-7 | ||
| Stuttgart | Clay | Final | Fritz | 3-6 6-7 | |
| ATP Finals - Turin | Indoor | Semi-finals | Fritz | 3-6 6-3 6-7 | |
| ATP Laver Cup | Indoor | Fritz | 4-6 5-7 | ||
| ATP US Open | Hard | Quarter-finals | Fritz | 7-6 3-6 6-4 7-6 | |
| ATP Wimbledon | Grass | 1/8-finals | Fritz | 4-6 6-7 6-4 7-6 6-3 | |
| ATP Rome | Clay | Quarter-finals | Zverev | 6-4 6-3 | |
| ATP United Cup | Hard | Fritz | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| ATP ATP Cup | Hard | Zverev | 6-4 6-4 |

