Odds
Player analysis
B. Van De Zandschulp has been inconsistent recently, going 3–2 over the last five matches. Point margins have been modest — DS averaging +7.7. Wins have been functional rather than dominant. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.1/10, leaving B. Van De Zandschulp vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Good performance in key moments — break point efficiency of +17 over the last five.
M. Fucsovics comes into this match in difficult form — 2 wins from the last 5. Form is mixed — DS ranging from -11.9 to 17.1, with at least one match where M. Fucsovics was clearly outplayed. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.3/10, leaving M. Fucsovics vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency is a red flag — M. Fucsovics has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -38 over recent matches.
Recent form
4W 1L last 5
| 5 Apr | Fucsovics | 4-6 3-6 | W |
| 21 Mar | Auger-Aliassime | 7-6 7-5 | L |
| 20 Mar | O'Connell | 6-7 3-6 | W |
| 9 Mar | Fucsovics | 3-6 5-7 | W |
| 6 Mar | Musetti | 5-7 1-6 | W |
4W 1L last 5
| 4 Apr | Navone | 5-7 7-6 7-5 | L |
| 3 Apr | Dzumhur | 3-6 3-6 | W |
| 1 Apr | Shevchenko | 5-7 1-6 | W |
| 31 Mar | Maestrelli | 3-6 2-6 | W |
| 20 Mar | Zandschulp | 3-6 7-6 3-6 | W |
Hard court stats
Avg stats — last 5
Head to head
Career meetings between these two players (all tournaments), not only this event. The match at the top of the page is the current tournament fixture.
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winston-Salem | Hard | Final | Fucsovics | 3-6 6-7 | |
| ATP Monte Carlo | Clay | 1/32-finals | Zandschulp | 3-6 7-6 6-1 | |
| Adelaide 2 | Hard | 1/16-finals | Fucsovics | 3-6 6-7 | |
| Stockholm | Indoor | 1/8-finals | Zandschulp | 6-7 6-3 5-7 |

