Odds
Player analysis
C. Gauff comes in with a 4–1 record over recent matches, with wins against quality opposition in the top 29 on average. Point margins have been modest — DS averaging +6.0. Wins have been functional rather than dominant. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 5.6/10, leaving C. Gauff vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure.
M. Sakkari comes into this match in difficult form — 1 wins from the last 5. Point statistics tell a concerning story — average DS of -5.6, meaning M. Sakkari has been on the wrong side of most exchanges over five matches. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 5.5/10, leaving M. Sakkari vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Good performance in key moments — break point efficiency of +13 over the last five.
Recent form
4W 1L last 5
| 28 Mar | Sabalenka | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | L |
| 26 Mar | Muchova | 6-1 6-1 | W |
| 25 Mar | Bencic | 3-6 6-1 3-6 | W |
| 23 Mar | Cirstea | 4-6 6-3 2-6 | W |
| 22 Mar | Parks | 6-3 0-6 1-6 | W |
Hard court stats
Avg stats — last 5
Head to head
Career meetings between these two players (all tournaments), not only this event. The match at the top of the page is the current tournament fixture.
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WTA United Cup | Hard | Gauff | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Miami | Hard | 1/16-finals | Gauff | 6-2 6-4 | |
| Indian Wells | Hard | 1/16-finals | Gauff | 7-6 6-2 | |
| WTA Indian Wells | Hard | Semi-finals | Sakkari | 4-6 7-6 2-6 | |
| WTA Beijing | Hard | Quarter-finals | Gauff | 2-6 4-6 | |
| WTA Washington | Hard | Final | Gauff | 2-6 3-6 | |
| Rome | Clay | 1/8-finals | Sakkari | 4-6 5-7 | |
| Doha | Hard | Quarter-finals | Sakkari | 3-6 3-6 | |
| Abu Dhabi | Hard | 1/16-finals | Sakkari | 7-5 6-2 |

