Odds
Player analysis
B. Nakashima comes into this match in difficult form — 2 wins from the last 5. Form is mixed — DS ranging from -16.3 to 15.2, with at least one match where B. Nakashima was clearly outplayed. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.1/10, leaving B. Nakashima vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency is a red flag — B. Nakashima has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -28 over recent matches.
A. Zverev shows a 4–1 form record, though the level of opposition has been mixed — average ranking of opponents is 35. Form is mixed — DS ranging from -14.9 to 26.9, with at least one match where A. Zverev was clearly outplayed. Serve quality has been average (6.5/10) — neither a weapon nor a significant liability. Break point efficiency is a red flag — A. Zverev has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -19 over recent matches.
Recent form
2W 3L last 5
| 18 Apr | Zverev | 3-6 3-6 | W |
| 17 Apr | Zverev | 5-7 6-0 6-2 | L |
| 16 Apr | Zverev | 6-1 6-2 | L |
| 14 Apr | Zverev | 6-3 3-6 7-6 | L |
| 11 Apr | Zverev | 1-6 4-6 | W |
2W 3L last 5
| 16 Apr | Fils | 6-2 6-3 | L |
| 14 Apr | Nakashima | 6-3 7-5 | L |
| 2 Apr | Burruchaga | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | L |
| 31 Mar | Damm | 6-7 2-6 | W |
| 22 Mar | Nakashima | 6-2 4-6 6-7 | W |
Hard court stats
Avg stats — last 5
Head to head
Career meetings between these two players (all tournaments), not only this event. The match at the top of the page is the current tournament fixture.
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATP Indian Wells | Hard | Indian Wells - 1/16-finals | Zverev | 6-7 7-5 4-6 | |
| Cincinnati | Hard | 1/16-finals | Zverev | 4-6 4-6 | |
| Stuttgart | Clay | Quarter-finals | Zverev | 7-5 6-4 | |
| ATP US Open | Hard | 1/8-finals | Zverev | 6-3 1-6 2-6 2-6 | |
| French Open | Clay | 1/16-finals | Zverev | 7-6 6-3 7-6 |

