Odds
Player analysis
K. Siniakova has been inconsistent recently, going 3–2 over the last five matches. Point statistics tell a concerning story — average DS of -4.4, meaning K. Siniakova has been on the wrong side of most exchanges over five matches. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 5.5/10, leaving K. Siniakova vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency is a red flag — K. Siniakova has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -11 over recent matches.
J. Pegula arrives in exceptional form — five wins from five, all against top-40 opposition. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 6.1/10, leaving J. Pegula vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure.
Recent form
0W 5L last 5
| 5 Apr | Pegula | 6-2 6-2 | L |
| 4 Apr | Pegula | 6-4 5-7 6-3 | L |
| 3 Apr | Pegula | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | L |
| 2 Apr | Pegula | 1-6 6-1 7-6 | L |
| 1 Apr | Pegula | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | L |
3W 2L last 5
| 18 Mar | Siniakova | 1-6 4-6 | W |
| 9 Mar | Andreeva | 6-4 6-7 3-6 | W |
| 8 Mar | Siniakova | 5-7 6-4 7-6 | L |
| 6 Mar | Siniakova | 1-6 6-4 6-1 | L |
| 16 Feb | Siniakova | 3-6 5-7 | W |
Hard court stats
Avg stats — last 5
Head to head
Career meetings between these two players (all tournaments), not only this event. The match at the top of the page is the current tournament fixture.
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wuhan | Hard | Quarter-finals | Pegula | 6-2 0-6 3-6 | |
| Bad Homburg | Grass | 1/8-finals | Pegula | 6-2 6-3 | |
| WTA Berlin | Clay | Quarter-finals | Pegula | 7-6 3-6 6-3 | |
| Doha | Hard | 1/32-finals | Pegula | 6-3 6-2 | |
| Bad Homburg | Grass | 1/8-finals | Siniakova | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | |
| Washington | Hard | 1/16-finals | Pegula | 4-6 3-6 |