Odds
Player analysis
S. Kraus has been inconsistent recently, going 3–2 over the last five matches. Point statistics tell a concerning story — average DS of -1.4, meaning S. Kraus has been on the wrong side of most exchanges over five matches. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 5.2/10, leaving S. Kraus vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Good performance in key moments — break point efficiency of +20 over the last five.
O. Selekhmeteva comes into this match in difficult form — 1 wins from the last 5. Point statistics tell a concerning story — average DS of -5.8, meaning O. Selekhmeteva has been on the wrong side of most exchanges over five matches. The serve has been a concern — averaging only 5.0/10, leaving O. Selekhmeteva vulnerable on second serve and facing frequent return pressure. Break point efficiency is a red flag — O. Selekhmeteva has been losing the important points, with a BP efficiency of -11 over recent matches.
Recent form
3W 2L last 5
| 22 Apr | Selekhmeteva | 4-6 1-6 | W |
| 13 Apr | Selekhmeteva | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | W |
| 10 Apr | Selekhmeteva | 3-6 6-7 | W |
| 8 Apr | Selekhmeteva | 4-6 6-4 7-6 | L |
| 8 Apr | Selekhmeteva | 7-5 6-2 | L |
3W 2L last 5
| 22 Apr | Pliskova | 2-6 6-1 6-4 | L |
| 21 Apr | Potapova | 2-6 7-6 3-6 | W |
| 20 Apr | Trevisan | 3-6 2-6 | W |
| 19 Apr | Chwalinska | 6-1 6-3 | L |
| 18 Apr | Marcinko | 4-6 6-1 4-6 | W |
Hard court stats
Avg stats — last 5
Head to head
Career meetings between these two players (all tournaments), not only this event. The match at the top of the page is the current tournament fixture.
| Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oeiras | Clay | 1/16-finals | Kraus | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | |
| Austin | Hard | 1/8-finals | Kraus | 6-2 1-6 6-4 | |
| Paris Challenger Women | Clay | 1/16-finals | Selekhmeteva | 6-4 5-7 2-6 |

